What does Pontivus Legal do?

Pontivus Legal is AI-assisted Thai-law contract review for law firms and in-house legal teams. It applies your legal team’s Review Standards during contract work and keeps Findings, comments, revisions and approvals connected through senior review.

Can Pontivus follow our own review approach?

Yes. Your lawyers define or validate a Review Standard for each agreement type and target language. Pontivus uses that standard during relevant contract review; it does not invent your legal positions or approval rules.

How is Pontivus different from ChatGPT or Copilot?

ChatGPT and Copilot work from the prompt and context provided in each interaction. Pontivus works from your legal team’s established Review Standards and keeps the review work connected to the contract.

Does Pontivus replace the lawyer?

No. Pontivus assists review and drafting. Your lawyers set or validate the requirements, verify the output, revise the contract and decide what is approved.

Does Pontivus cite Thai law where relevant?

Yes. Where Thai statutory law is relevant, Pontivus shows the cited text with the clause analysis for lawyer verification. It does not force a citation where statutory law is not relevant.

How is contract data handled?

Contract files and review data are hosted in Germany under GDPR. On DOCX import, reviewers can identify or redact PII before relevant text is sent to an AI model. Detailed processing, access and retention terms belong in the Privacy Notice.

Can we keep using Word?

Yes. Import an existing DOCX and export approved contract text as DOCX. The review history, comments, revisions and approvals remain in Pontivus.

For Thai legal teams

The information needed to review a contract is often in many places.

Precedent, email, document comments, earlier decisions, AI/chat output and senior know-how can all matter — but the contract alone does not carry them.

Apply for private pilot See how the work stays together ↓

PRECEDENT

Evidence of coverage must be available on request.

MSA · prior position

DOCUMENT COMMENT

Make the evidence requirement explicit.

Master Service Agreement§8

Andaman × Siam Precision

AI/chat output: clause may not make evidence of coverage explicit.

Please align this with our MSA insurance position.

Earlier matter · 14:18

SENIOR KNOW-HOW

Acceptable only if supporting evidence can be required.

The contract moves. The reasons may not.

Andaman × Siam Precision MSASection 8 · Insurance

Acceptable only if supporting evidence can be required.

01Different lawyers may start with different information.

02The next lawyer may need to determine what was already considered and why.

03Senior review may begin by working out what changed before reaching the substantive decision.

A better operating situation

Give every lawyer the relevant review approach — and keep the work with the contract.

The next lawyer should be able to continue from work already done. The senior lawyer should see that work before deciding.

Turn your team’s review approach for an agreement type and target language into a Review Standard.

Each Review Standard is scoped to an agreement type and target language. Your legal team can define it directly, or Pontivus can prepare a candidate for lawyer review and editing.

Define it directly.

The legal team defines the requirements itself.

Prepare a candidate with AI assistance.

Review Methodology Representative DOCX · MSA · English

Pontivus prepares a candidate → lawyer reviews / edits

LEGAL-TEAM-ESTABLISHED

Review Standard

Master Service Agreement English

Generate a first working draft — or import an existing DOCX.

Generate draft

Generate a first working draft from the applicable Review Standard and deal background & purpose.

DOCX import

Bring an existing DOCX into Pontivus for review.

Optional personal-data review/redaction applies to DOCX import before relevant text is sent for AI processing.

Both paths continue into the same contract matter.

Use the Review Standard in the clause — and keep the review work with it.

Illustrative MSA · Section 8 · Insurance · version 3

Andaman × Siam Precision MSA Section 8 · Insurance

THE REVIEW BASIS

Review Standard · MSA · English

Evidence of coverage must be available on request.

THE CLAUSE

Section 8 · Insurance

The Supplier shall maintain insurance appropriate to its obligations under this Agreement.

Finding

FindingAI-assisted

The original clause does not expressly require the Supplier to provide evidence of coverage on request.

Issue Kind: Insurance · Basis: Review Standard

Discussion about this Finding

Narin S. · Senior reviewer

Make the evidence requirement explicit before approval.

Ploy K. · Reviewer

Agreed. Proposed wording is shown separately below.

Related proposed wording on the same clause

The Supplier shall maintain insurance appropriate to its obligations under this Agreement and provide evidence of coverage when requested by the Customer.

AI helps. Lawyers decide.

Pontivus can identify and propose. Your legal team remains responsible for the legal position and the decision.

The senior lawyer sees the contract and the work already done.

Andaman × Siam Precision MSA Section 8 · Insurance

THE REVIEW BASIS Review Standard · MSA · English

THE CLAUSE The Supplier shall maintain insurance appropriate to its obligations under this Agreement.

Finding · AI-assisted The original clause does not expressly require the Supplier to provide evidence of coverage on request.

Discussion about this Finding Related proposed wording on the same clause

Scoped reuse

Use the relevant Review Standard across comparable contracts.

Reuse stays within the Review Standard’s agreement type and target language.

Review Standard Master Service Agreement · English

01Andaman × Siam Precision MSA

02Chiang Mai Logistics MSA

03Bangkok Industrial MSA

What changes for the team

Start from the relevant team approach.

The Review Standard is explicit and reusable within its scope.

Continue from work already done.

Findings and related review work remain with the matter.

Give senior legal the work before the decision.

The handoff carries the substantive review work, not only the document.

ONE ToolONE Team

Your review approach, contract work and decisions stay together. Lawyers stay in control.

Operational fit

Fit Pontivus around the contract work your team already does.

DOCX in / DOCX out

Upload an existing contract and export approved contract text as DOCX.

Generate draft

Begin new work from the applicable Review Standard.

Personal-data review on import

On DOCX import, reviewers can identify or redact personal data before relevant text is sent to an AI model.

Authority · Thai law · data

Your lawyers stay in control.

Lawyer authority

Your lawyers set or validate the Review Standard, verify the output and decide what is approved. Pontivus does not set legal positions or approve contracts.

Thai law

Where Thai statutory law is relevant, Pontivus shows cited text for lawyer verification. Coverage remains bounded.

Data

Contract files and review data are hosted in Germany under GDPR. Personal-data review is available on DOCX import before relevant text is sent to an AI model.

Human practice grounding

Advised by practising Thai commercial lawyers

Lawyers with law-firm and in-house experience advise on how Pontivus supports contract review, Thai-law analysis and senior approval in real legal-team workflows.

Arada Pinyoying

Managing Director, Pro-Legal Services

LL.B., Assumption University · Lawyers Council of Thailand member

Practice background spans Thai legal document services, eDiscovery, and litigation support. Previously a corporate lawyer at Acclime.

Experience: 15+ years
Practice focus: Corporate contracts · eDiscovery
Languages: Thai · English

Advises on contract review workflow and legal document operations.

Chintana Sittisongkram

Senior Legal Manager, Hyundai Mobility Thailand

LL.B. LL.M (Intellectual Property and International Trade Law)

Senior in-house counsel with experience in Thai commercial contracts and regulatory compliance. Advises on the accuracy of AI-generated findings against the Thai Civil and Commercial Code.

Experience: 15+ years
Practice focus: Commercial law · Regulatory
Languages: Thai · English

Reviews AI-generated findings against Thai statutory authority.

Frequently asked questions

Post-pilot pricing

Pricing begins after a successful private pilot.

For teams that continue after the pilot. Monthly pricing does not begin when you apply.

SME

For smaller legal teams and lower monthly review volumes.

฿14,990/ month

5 seats
15,000 credits / month

Firm

For larger legal teams and higher monthly review volumes.

฿34,990/ month

15 seats
60,000 credits / month

The private pilot is application-only for a selected two-week cohort. Your team decides whether to continue.

Apply for private pilot

Founding Firms programme

Apply for the private pilot.

A two-week evaluation for selected Thai law firms and in-house legal teams. Use representative agreements to decide whether this operating model belongs in your contract-review process.

Invite-only two-week Founding Firms programme; 10 firms; apply only; pricing after successful pilot